Investigation of uterine microbiota in postpartum dairy cows and barn environment by quantitative PCR technique
,
,
, &
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate uterine microbiota in postpartum dairy cows and barn environment by quantitative PCR and to evaluate the correlation between the microbiota in the uterus and barn environment. The study was carried out in 2 seasons of the year: summer (June to August 2017) and winter (October 2017 to March 2018) on Holstein dairy cow farm, Okayama Livestock Research Institute, Japan. A total of 116 samples, including 68 uterine and fecal samples, were collected from 9 cows in summer and 8 cows in winter, at 1 and 2 months after calving. Additionally, 48 samples of barn environment including airborne dust, bedding, feed and water samples were collected 6 times throughout each season. The quantative PCR results showed significant differences (P < 0.05) in the uterine and fecal microbiota of dairy cows at 1 and 2 months after calving. In summer, total bacteria at 2 months postpartum were higher than those at 1 month after calving, while total bacteria were the same in winter (P > 0.05). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in uterus and feces between 1 and 2 months after calving were not significantly different in both summer and winter (P > 0.05). The populations of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and total bacteria were found to be highest in bedding compared to those in feed, airborne dust, and water from the barn environment (P < 0.05). Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and total bacteria in uterus were closely related with those in bedding in summer, however they had the negative correlation with the microbiota of barn environment in winter, especially with fecal microbiota.
Article Details
References
Azawi, O. (2008). Postpartum uterine infection in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 105(3-4), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.010.
Bicalho, M. L. S., Lima, F. S., Higgins, C. H., Machado, V. S., & Bicalho, R. C. (2017). Genetic and functional analysis of the bovine uterine microbiota. Part I: Metritis versus healthy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 100(5), 3850-3862. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12058.
Gautam, G., Nakao, T., Yusuf, M., & Koike. K. (2009). Prevalence of endometritis during the postpartum period and its impact on subsequent reproductive performance in two Japanese dairy herds. Animal Reproduction Science 116(3-4), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.02.001.
Ghanem, M. E., Tezuka, E., Devkota, B., Izaike, Y., & Osawa, T. (2015). Persistence of uterine bacterial infection, and its associations with endometritis and ovarian function in postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development 61(1), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2014-051.
Gilbert, R. O., Shin, S. T., Guard, C. L., Erb, H. N., & Frajblat, M. (2005). Prevalence of endometritis and its effects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Theriogenology 64(9), 1879-1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Theriogenology.2005.04.022.
Griffin, J. F., Hartigan, P. J., & Nunn, W. R. (1974). Non-specific uterine infection and bovine fertility. I. Infection patterns and endometritis during the first 7 week post-partum. Theriogenology 1(3), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(74)90052-1.
Heppelmann, M., Krach, K., Krueger, L., Benz, P., Herzog, K., Piechotta, M., Hoedemaker, M., & Bollwein, H. (2015). The effect of metritis and subclinical hypocalcemia on uterine involution in dairy cows evaluated by sonomicrometry. Journal of Reproduction and Development 61(6), 565-569. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2015-015.
Heppelmann, M., Weinert, M., Brömmling, A., Piechotta, M., Hoedemaker, M., & Bollwein, H. (2013). The effect of puerperal uterine disease on uterine involution in cows assessed by doppler sonography of the uterine arteries. Animal Reproduction Science 143(1-4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.11.003.
Knudsen, L. R. V., Karstrup, C. C., Pedersen, H. G., Angen, Ø., Agerholm, J. S., Rasmussen, E. L., Jensen, T. K., & Klitgaard, K. (2016). An investigation of the microbiota in uterine flush samples and endometrial biopsies from dairy cows during the first 7 weeks postpartum. Theriogenology 86(2), 642-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Theriogenology.2016.02.016.
Nguyen, T. T., Miyake, A., Tran, T. M. T., Tsuruta, T., & Nishino N. (2019a). The relationshiP between uterine, fecal, bedding, and airborne dust microbiota from dairy cows and their environment: a pilot study. Animals 9(12), 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121007.
Nguyen, T. T., & Nishino, N. (2021). Investigation of milk microbiota in dairy cows at 1 anfd 2 months after calving by quantitative PCR. In Proceedings of The National Conference on Animal and Veterinary Sciences (655-660). Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam: Hue University Publishing House.
Nguyen, T. T., Tran, T. M. T., Tsuruta, T., & Nishino, N. (2019b). Stability and variability of the uterine microbiota in postpartum dairy cows. In Proceedings of The National Conference on Animal and Veterinary Sciences (181-185). Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Agricultural Publishing House.
Polsky, L., Marina, A. G., & Keyserlingk, V. (2017). Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 8645-8657. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12651.
Potter, T. J., Guitian, J., Fishwick, J., Gordon, P. J., & Sheldon, I. M. (2010). Risk factors for clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cattle. Theriogenology 74(1), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Theriogenology.2010.01.023.
Rensis, F. D., Ispierto, I. G., & Gatius, F. L. (2015). Seasonal heat stress: Clinical implications and hormone treatments for the fertility of dairy cows. Theriogenology 84(5), 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Theriogenology.2015.04.021.
Santos, T. M. A., & Bicalho, R. C. (2012). Diversity and succession of bacterial communities in the uterine fluid of postpartum metritic, endometritic and healthy dairy cows. PLoS One. 7(12), e53048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053048.
Sheldon, I. M., & Dobson, H. (2004). Postpartum uterine health in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 82-83, 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.006.