Ho M. Nguyen , Anh T. Quach * , Anh T. T. Le , & Hien T. Le

* Correspondence: Quach Tuyet Anh (email: anh.quachtuyet@hcmuaf.edu.vn)

Main Article Content


Live virus vaccines are very important parts of the prevention of Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) in chickens. However, the successful IBD vaccination depends on IBD field pressure, vaccination technique, the immune status of the chicken, and especially IBDV strains used in the vaccines which are able to break through a higher level of maternal-derived antibodies (MDA). The objective of this field study was to compare the efficacy of a new vaccine based on M.B. strain to other commercial vaccines (LIBDV and winterfiled 2512) in terms of speed of antibody immune response and interference to Newcastle Disease (ND) vaccination. Six houses of broilers, each with 15,000 to 16,000 chickens, were divided into two groups: (1) vaccinated with M.B. strain (group A) and (2) vaccinated with LIBDV or 2512 strains (group B). Blood samples were collected prior to the 1st IBD vaccination, and at 21, 28 and 35 days of age for IBD and ND antibodies. Comparison of lesion scores and uniformity of the bursa of Fabricius (BF) at 28 and 35 days of age was carried out. Results showed that both groups had good immune responses, but group A showed significantly higher IBD antibody titers at 28 and 35 days of age. Antibody titers for ND and histopathological lesion scores of the BF were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The BF in group A was more uniform and had fewer lesions when compared with that in group B. In conclusion, the IBD vaccine with an M.B. strain can provide better immunological efficacy than LIBDV and 2512 strains.

Keywords: Break through MDA, Chicken, M.B. strain, Uniformity

Article Details


Alkie, T. N., & Rautenschlein, S. (2016). Infectious bursal disease virus in poultry: current status and future prospects. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports 7, 9-18. 10.2147/VMRR.S68905

Allan, W. H., Faragher, J. T., & Cullen, G. A. (1972). Immunosuppression by the infectious bursal agent in chickens immunized against Newcastle disease. The Veterinary Record 90(18), 511-512.

Allan, W. H., & Gough, R. E. (1974). A standard haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease. (1) A comparison of macro and micro methods. Veterinary Record 95(6), 120-123.

Berg, T. P. (2000). Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: a review. Avian Pathology 29(3), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450050045431

Berg, T. P., & Meulemans, G. (1991). Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: protection afforded by maternally derived antibodies and interference with live vaccination. Avian Pathology 20(3), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459108418779

Bughio, E., Jatoi, A. S., Memon, M., Bughio, R., Khoso, P. A., Khoso, Z. A., & Baloch, A. A. (2017). Effect of age and route of administration on the efficacy of live infectious bursal disease vaccines in broiler. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 33, 232-239.

De Wit, J . J. (2001). Gumboro disease: estimation of optimal time of vaccination by the Deventer formula. Annual Report and Proceedings of COST Action 839: Immunosuppressive Viral Diseases in Poultry (170-178). Deventer, the Netherlands: Animal Health Service.

Eterradossi, N., & Saif, Y. M. (2008). Infectious Bursal Disease. In Swayne, D. E. (Ed.). Disease of poultry (13th ed., 219-245). Iowa, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Fantay, H., Balcha, E., Tesfay, A., & Afera, B. (2015). Determining optimum time for administration of live intermediate vaccine of infectious bursal disease to chickens at mekelle farm. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 6(3), 223.

Farhanah, M. I., Yasmin, A. R., Khanh, N. P., Yeap, S. K., Hair-Bejo, M., & Omar, A. R., (2018). Bursal immunopathology responses of specific pathogen free chickens and red jungle fowl infected with very virulent infectious bursal disease virus. Archives of Virology 163(8), 2085-2097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-018-3841-7

Fischer, A. H., Jacobson, K. A., Rose, J., & Zeller, R. (2008). Paraffin embedding tissue samples for sectioning. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot4989

Gardin, Y., Palya, V., Cazaban, C., Lozano, F., Alva, B., El Attrache, J., & Dorsey, M. K. (2011). Vaccines and vaccinations against Gumboro disease: the key points. Retrieved September 29, 2018, from https://en.engormix.com/poultryindustry/articles34914.htm.

Gomes, L., Ashash, U., & Banet-Noach, C. (2015). A field study on broiler flocks in Brazil to evaluate zootechnical parameters, molecular epidemiology, and condemnation index with the use of Live IBD Vaccine versus HVT-IBD Vector Vaccine. Retrieved September 29, 2018, from http://www.wvpa.net/pdfs/articles/WVPC-2015AB058.pdf.

Jackwood, D. (2017). Optimizing immunity in ‘no antibiotics ever’ and ‘reduced use’ broiler flocks. Retrived September 29, 2018, from https://poultryhealthtoday.com/opt.pdf

Jackwood, D. J., & Sommer, S. E. (1999). Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the VP2 gene of infectious bursal disease viruses from outside the United States. Avian Diseases 43(2), 310-314. https://doi.org/10.2307/1592622

Khenenou, T., Bougherara, M., Melizi, M., & Lamraoui, R. (2017). Histomorphological study of the bursae of fabricius of broiler chickens during gumboro disease in Algeria area. Global Veterinaria 18(2), 132-136. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.gv.2017.132.136

Lazarus, D., Pasmanik-Chor, M., Gutter, B., Gallili, G., Barbakov, M., Krispel, S., & Pitcovski, J. (2008). Attenuation of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus and comparison of full sequences of virulent and attenuated strains. Avian Pathology 37(2), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450801910206

Le Gros, F. X., Dancer, A., Giacomini, C., Pizzoni, L., Bublot, M., Graziani, M., & Prandini, F. (2009). Field efficacy trial of a novel HVT-IBD vector vaccine for 1-day-old broilers. Vaccine 27(4), 592-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.094

Moraes, H., Salle, C., Padilha, A., Nascimento, V., Souza, G., Pereira, R., Artencio, J., & Salle, F. (2004). Infectious bursal disease: evaluation of pathogenicity of commercial vaccines from Brazil in specific pathogen free chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 6(4), 243-247.

Muller, H., Mundt, E., Eterradossi, N., & Islam, M. R. (2012). Current status of vaccines against infectious bursal disease. Avian pathology 41(2), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2012.661403

Muskett, J., Hopkins, I., Edwards, K., & Thornton, D. (1979). Comparison of two infectious bursal disease vaccine strains: efficacy and potential hazards in susceptible and maternally immune birds. The Veterinary Record 104(15), 332-334. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104.15.332

Rautenschlein, S., Kraemer, C. H., Vanmarke, J., & Montiel, E. (2005). Protective efficacy of intermediate and intermediate plus infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccines against very virulent IBDV in commercial broilers. Avian Disseases 49(2), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1637/7310-112204R

Sellaoui, S., Alloui, N., Mehenaoui, S., & Djaaba, S. (2012). Evaluation of size and lesion scores of bursa cloacae in broiler flocks in Algeria. Journal of World’s Poultry Research 2(3), 37-39.

Van den Berg, T. P., Eterradossi, N., Toquin, D., & Meulemans, G. (2000). Infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease). Revue scientifique et technique 19(2), 509-543.